Nail Polish & Cosmetic Products

Nail Polish & Cosmetic Products

Due to routine and frequent use by consumers, our clients pay close attention when harmful chemicals are present in ordinary cosmetic and beauty products. The Chanler Group’s clients have successfully resolved many Proposition 65 enforcement actions brought against cosmetics and beauty salon industry members, as well as against chemical suppliers of those companies.

Our clients’ investigations have revealed high levels of a number of toxic chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm, including toluene, lead, and phthalate chemicals used as plasticizers in the vinyl/PVC manufacturing process. In negotiating settlements on behalf of our clients, The Chanler Group’s attorneys have obtained commitments from industry members to remove these listed chemicals from a variety of products, including nail polish and enamel, eye shadow, eyeliner, lipstick, and cosmetic and toiletry cases.

Toluene is the second-highest volume ingredient in many nail polishes, as it allows polish to remain fluid and to spread evenly at varying temperatures. Toluene, however, is listed by the State of California as a chemical that is known to cause reproductive harm or birth defects. Individuals using toluene-containing polishes or enamels are exposed to the chemical by inhalation while applying the product.

During 1993 and 1994, investigations conducted on behalf of The Chanler Group’s clients revealed significant levels of toluene in nail polish sold without a warning in California. A nonprofit public-interest group represented by the founder of our firm filed 45 private Proposition 65 enforcement actions naming major cosmetics manufacturers and retailers as defendants. The industry resisted and filed a SLAPP action (strategic lawsuit against public participation) in federal court in an effort to silence the private enforcer’s claims and allegations. Through tenacious litigation our attorneys obtained a dismissal of the industry’s suit and prevailed in state court, successfully enjoining the industry members from further unwarned sales in California. Ultimately, The Chanler Group obtained a commitment from 43 of the defendant manufacturers, including some of the biggest names in the industry, to completely remove toluene from their nail enamel and polish products.  The success extended beyond California, as the mostly-national companies undertook to reformulate all of their products sold nationwide. Today, the industry uses “toluene-free” to market many of its nail products.

Other successful enforcement actions brought by our clients and resolved in the public interest include cases of lead in eyeliner, eyeshadow, and other makeup products and vinyl makeup kits and toiletry cases containing lead and DEHP.  Today, our clients continue their efforts to protect the health and safety of California consumers by investigating cosmetic products for lead, toluene, and phthalates. 

To review legal agreements which our clients have reached with companies that sell nail polish and other cosmetic products, please see the cases below.

firm casework - enforcement

March 25, 2019
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On March 25, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party SZCO Supplies Inc. (“SZCO”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement. Vinocur had alleged that SZCO sold vinyl pouches containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard...
February 20, 2019
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Moore v. Universal Beauty Products Incorporated executed a Consent Judgment on February 20, 2019.  In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that Universal Beauty Products Incorporated (“Universal Beauty”) sold vinyl/PVC toiletry cases containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (...
July 3, 2017
Benzophenone
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Held v. The Procter & Gamble Company executed a Consent Judgment on July 3, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) sold sunscreen containing the chemical benzophenone in the State of California without providing the requisite health...
May 26, 2017
Benzophenone
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Moore v. E.T. Browne Drug Co., Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on May 26, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that E.T. Browne Drug Co., Inc. (“E.T. Browne”) sold sunscreen containing the chemical benzophenone in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.  ...
April 6, 2017
Benzophenone
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Held v. CCA Industries, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on April 6, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that CCA Industries, Inc. (“CCA”) sold sunscreen containing the chemical benzophenone in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.   As...
March 27, 2017
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. The Naterra Company executed a Consent Judgment on March 27, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged that Naterra International, Inc. (“Naterra”) sold vinyl/PVC toiletry bags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
March 22, 2017
Benzophenone
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Held v. Prime Enterprises, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on March 22, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that Prime Enterprises, Inc. (“Prime”) sold sunscreen products containing the chemical benzophenone in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard...
February 16, 2017
Benzophenone
Out-of-Court Settlement
On February 16, 2017, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling party PhotoMedex, Inc. (“PhotoMedex”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.  Held had alleged that PhotoMedex sold sunscreen containing the chemical benzophenone in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. As part of the...