The Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in DiPirro v. Hobbico, Inc., et al. on November 14, 2001. This enforcement action resolved the allegations of citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro that defendant Hobbico, Inc. distributed and/or sold iron cleaner products containing toluene and fuel products containing nitromethane in the State of California without...
Citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations against the defendant SIG Manufacturing Company, Inc. ("SIG") were resolved on April 2, 2001, when the parties executed a Consent Judgment. DiPirro alleged that SIG sold adhesives and fuel containing the chemicals trichloethylene and nitromethane in the State of California without providing the requisite health...
On August 15, 2000, citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro, and settling party Sportcraft, Ltd. entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved DiPirro's allegations that Sportcraft sold certain sporting equipment adhesive that contains toluene in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As part of the settlement,...
The parties involved in the case DiPirro v. Poolmaster Inc., et al., executed a Consent Judgment on December 18, 2001, which resolved citizen enforcer DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Poolmaster sold certain vinyl repair kits containing toluene in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. The Consent Judgment was later...
On June 22, 1995, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, As You Sow, and manufacturer of chromatography products, Restek Corporation, submitted their May 18, 1995, settlement to the San Francisco Superior Court for approval and entry as a judgment. The settlement resolved pending litigation between AYS and Restek; AYS alleged that Restek violated Proposition 65...
In a stipulated judgment submitted to the Alameda County Superior Court on July 9, 1995 (Case No. 748827-2), for approval and entry as a judgment, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, As You Sow, and manufacturer of resins, composites, and other specialty products, Hexcel Corporation, resolved AYS's allegation that Hexcel violated Proposition 65 when it...
The Superior Court of California In and For the County of Marin entered a Consent Judgment in 1995 in As You Sow v. Miller-Stephenson Chemical Company, Inc., et al., which resolved private enforcer As You Sow's allegations that the defendant Miller-Stephenson Chemical Company, Inc. ("MSC") sold certain paints and solvent products containing toluene and/or...
A Consent Judgment in the As You Sow v. Chemical Packaging Corporation, et al. matter, heard in the San Francisco County Superior Court, was entered on December 28, 1995. The Consent Judgment resolved private enforcer As You Sow's allegations that defendant Chemical Packaging Corporation ("CPC") sold paint and solvents containing toluene and methylene chloride (...
A Stipulated Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in As You Sow v. Monsanto Company, et al., Case No. CGC-96-975872, on February 29, 1996, concluded litigation between private Proposition 65 enforcer and whistleblower As You Sow and chemical manufacturer Monsanto Company. The settlement resolved AYS's claims that Monsanto sold certain adhesives comprised of...
The Superior Court of California in and for the county of Marin entered a Consent Judgment in 1995 in As You Sow v. United Gilsonite Laboratories, et al., which resolved private enforcers As You Sow’s allegations that the defendant United Gilsonite Laboratories (“UGL”) sold certain paints and solvent products containing toluene in the State of California...
