Ceramic Food & Beverage Products
Synonyms
- Ceramic Food and Beverage Products
April 6, 2006
Tajimi (U.S.A.), Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Tajimi (U.S.A.), Inc.
April 21, 2006
Tablas Creek Vineyard elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 21, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Tablas Creek Vineyard
December 27, 2005
Syratech Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Syratech Corporation
November 10, 2005
Sutter Home Winery, Inc. dba Trinchero Family Estates and Montevina Winery ("Sutter") elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 10, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Sutter Home Winery, Inc. dba Trinchero Family Estates and Montevina Winery
February 10, 2006
In the case Brimer v. Starbucks Corporation, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on February 10, 2006. In this enforcement matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks") sold ceramic mugs and other glassware products with colored artwork on the exterior surface that contain the heavy metal...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Starbucks Corporation
January 5, 2006
Springs Industries, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Springs Industries, Inc.
August 11, 2006
Spirit Products, Ltd. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on August 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Spirit Products, Ltd.
April 12, 2006
Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc.
November 21, 2007
Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's enforcement action against defendants Solo Cup Company dba Creative Expressions Group and Solo Cup Operating Corporation (collectively "Solo") was resolved on November 21, 2007, when the San Francisco County Superior Court granted the parties' motion to approve the Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Solo Cup Company, et al. In...
Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Solo Cup Company dba Creative Expressions Group, Solo Cup Operating Corporation
November 21, 2005
Smith-Western Co. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Smith-Western Co.
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.