MeadWestvaco Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
The Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay of the San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on May 1, 2006, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant McIlhenny Company ("McIlhenny") sold mugs and other glass and ceramic tableware with colored artwork on the exterior surface containing the heavy metal lead and/or cadmium...
The Oakland branch of the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on December 13, 2006, in Brimer v. McCaulou's Department Store; Ganz, Inc. In this enforcement action, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants McCaulou's, Inc., ("McCoulou's") and Ganz, Inc. ("Ganz") sold glassware, mugs, and other tableware...
Marek, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case Brimer v. The Madden Corporation, et al., on October 20, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant The Madden Corporation ("Madden") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold certain glass steins, shot glasses and other glassware and ceramicware with...
M.S.R.S. Inc. dba VM International elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
M. Cornell Importers, Inc elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
M&F Western Products, Inc elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 14, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
On August 21, 2004, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., and settling defendant Lyon Design, Inc. entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Leeman's allegations that Lyon sold certain glass containers with colored artwork or designs containing lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As part of...
Lynn Roberts International elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
