Target Corporation
February 26, 2014
(Other) Reproductive Harm, Birth Defects, DEHP, Phthalates, Russell Brimer, Target Corporation, Toiletries, Vinyl/PVC ID Pouches, Vinyl/PVC Manicure Cases
December 21, 2001
The parties involved in the case DiPirro v. Target Corporation, The Coleman Company, et al., executed a Consent Judgment on December 21, 2001. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant The Coleman Company ("Coleman") sold adhesives and other adhesive repair products containing the solvent toluene in the...
Adhesives & Supplies, Michael DiPirro, Proposition 65, Target Corporation, The Coleman Company, Inc., Toluene
December 13, 2013
(Other) Reproductive Harm, Birth Defects, DEHP, Leeman, Pepsico, Inc., Reading & Writing, Stationery & Office Supplies, Target Corporation
November 15, 2013
Citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's enforcement action against Target Corporation concluded when a Consent Judgment was executed in DiPirro v. Target Corporation on September 11, 2002, that resolved DiPirro's allegations that Target sold photo frames containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
Target...
October 25, 2013
(Other) Reproductive Harm, Anthony E. Held, Birth Defects, Decorative Glass/Ceramic, Home Décor, Lead, Pacific Trade International, Inc., Target Corporation
October 25, 2013
Anthony E. Held, Blu Dot Design & Manufacturing, Inc., Cancer, Residential Furniture, Target Corporation, TCEP, TDCPP
August 16, 2013
The Consent Judgment that was executed on August 16, 2013, resolved whistleblower Peter Englander’s allegations against the Chinese manufacturer DAP, Incorporated (“DAP”). In the enforcement action Englander v. Target Corporation; et al., Englander’s assertions that DAP sold tape measures with vinyl components and tools with vinyl grips containing...
October 7, 2013
Citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur’s allegations against defendant Sauder Woodworking Co. and Target Corporation (“Sauder”) were resolved on October 7, 2013, when the parties executed a Consent Judgment. In this matter, Vinocur alleged that Sauder and Target sold upholstered office chairs with foam padding containing tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate...
Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Laurence Vinocur, Office Chairs, Proposition 65, Proposition 65 Warning, Reformulation, Sauder Woodworking Co, Target Corporation, TDCPP, Whistleblower
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.