Home Decor

Forever Beautiful elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Cadmium, Lead
A Consent Judgment in the DiPirro v. Elsa L, Inc., et al. matter, heard in the Alameda County Superior Court, was entered on July 29, 2003. The Consent Judgment resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Elsa L, Inc. sold photo frames containing lead and lead compounds in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard...
Home Decor
Lead
Citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro and settling defendant Dale Tiffany, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on December 28, 2001, subsequently approved and entered the Superior Court of California County of Alameda, which resolved DiPirro's allegations that Dale Tiffany sold photo frames containing the heavy metal lead and/or lead compounds in the State of California without...
Home Decor
Lead
A Consent Judgment in the DiPirro v. Croscill, Inc., et al. matter, heard in the San Francisco County Superior Court, was entered on October 31, 2002. The Consent Judgment resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Croscill, Inc. sold glass and steel frames, lamps, and decorative items containing lead and lead compounds ("products...
Home Decor
Lead
Citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro and settling defendant Cost Plus, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on June 29, 2001, later approved by the Superior Court of California County of Alameda, resolving DiPirro's allegations that Cost Plus sold photo and picture frames containing the heavy metal lead and/or lead compounds in the State of California without providing the...
Home Decor
Lead
A Consent Judgment in the DiPirro v. Coldwater Creek, et al. matter, heard in the San Francisco County Superior Court, was entered on February 27, 2003. The Consent Judgment resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Coldwater Creek sold tiffany style lamps containing lead and lead compounds in the State of California without providing the...
Home Decor
Lead
Citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro and settling defendant Chadwick's of Boston, Ltd. executed a Consent Judgment on November 7, 2001, which the Superior Court of California County of Alameda subsequently approved, which resolved DiPirro's allegations that Chadwick's sold picture frames containing the heavy metal lead and/or lead compounds in the State of California...
Home Decor
Lead
January 12, 2004
On January 12, 2004, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., and settling defendant Catamount Glassware entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Leeman's allegations that Catamount sold certain glassware with colored artwork, designs, or markings containing lead (or lead compounds) in the State of California without providing the requisite...
Lead
December 13, 2004
The Alameda County Superior Court of California entered a Consent Judgment on December 13, 2004 in Leeman v. Carlton Cards Retail, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Carlton sold Tiffany-style lamps that contained lead or lead compounds in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard...
Home Decor
Lead
November 18, 2005
C & D Visionary, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Cadmium, Lead