A Consent Judgment in the DiPirro v. Chinese Craftsmen, Inc. dba Berkeley Designs, et al. matter, heard in the San Francisco County Superior Court, was entered on May 19, 2003. The Consent Judgment resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Chinese Craftsmen, Inc. dba Berkeley Designs sold picture frames containing lead and lead compounds in...
On January 12, 2004, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., and settling defendant Catamount Glassware entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Leeman's allegations that Catamount sold certain glassware with colored artwork, designs, or markings containing lead (or lead compounds) in the State of California without providing the requisite...
C & D Visionary, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
On July 3, 2007, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Busch Entertainment Corporation, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Busch Entertainment Corporation and Sea World, Inc. (collectively "Busch") sold mugs and other ceramic containers and glassware with colored artwork...
Brown-Forman Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Broguiere’s Farm Fresh Dairy, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
On May 4, 2007, the Los Angeles Central District County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Bristol Farms, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Bristol Farms and New Bristol Farms, Inc. (collectively "Bristol Farms") sold glass bottles and other glassware with colored artwork containing the heavy...
On June 11, 2009, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Boston Warehouse Trading Corp., resolving citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Boston Warehouse Trading Corp. ("Boston") sold ceramic mugs and other ceramic tableware products intended for the consumption of food or beverages with colored artwork...
Blyth, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
In a September 27, 2001 stipulated judgment, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, Michael DiPirro, and internet retailer, Bluefly, Inc., agreed to terms resolving DiPirro's allegation that Bluefly sold crystal ware products containing lead without providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Lead is listed pursuant to Proposition 65 as a...
