On August 22, 2001, Proposition 65 private enforcer, Russel Brimer, and manufacturer of crystal and glassware products, Wells Mfg., Inc., agreed to settlement terms that resolve pending litigation, and Brimer's allegation that Wells violated Proposition 65 when it sold wine glasses, goblets, and other glassware with exterior decorations containing lead and cadmium in...
Warwick’s Stationers elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 26, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Walong Marketing, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Virgin Entertainment Group, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 29, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
VE Wong Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 29, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations against the settling party Van Group, Inc. were resolved on March 28, 2005, when the parties entered an out-of-court settlement agreement. Brimer alleged that Van sold decorated glassware containing the heavy metals lead and cadmium in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As part of...
VA Software Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
V. Sattui Winery elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 10, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
In the case Brimer v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc.; et al. the Honorable James L. Warren entered a Consent Judgment on January 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants Universal Screen Arts, Inc., Signals Catalogue Corp., Lillian Vernon Corporation, Casual Living USA, Inc., and RedEnvelope, Inc. (collectively "Defendants")...
Two's Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 28, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
