The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Brimer v. Cables to Go, et al. on December 15, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Cables to Go, Lastar, Inc., TigerDirect, Inc., and Systemax Inc. ("Defendants") manufactured, sold, and/or distributed certain solder (containing lead)...
The Alameda County Superior Court entered an Order Regarding Terms of Settlement in DiPirro v. C.K. Worldwide, Inc. on December 20, 1999 based on an agreement made by the parties during a Settlement Conference that took place on November 19, 1999. This enforcement action resolved the allegations of citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro that defendant C.K. Worldwide, Inc. sold cold...
C & D Visionary, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
On July 3, 2007, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Busch Entertainment Corporation, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Busch Entertainment Corporation and Sea World, Inc. (collectively "Busch") sold mugs and other ceramic containers and glassware with colored artwork...
Brown-Forman Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
On January 8, 2001, the Superior Court of California County of Alameda entered a Consent Judgment in DiPirro v. Brownells, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Brownells sold sporting goods maintenance and repair products containing cadmium, nickel and nickel compounds, carbon monoxide, and lead in the State of...
Broguiere’s Farm Fresh Dairy, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
On May 4, 2007, the Los Angeles Central District County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Bristol Farms, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Bristol Farms and New Bristol Farms, Inc. (collectively "Bristol Farms") sold glass bottles and other glassware with colored artwork containing the heavy...
The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including Boston...
On June 11, 2009, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Boston Warehouse Trading Corp., resolving citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Boston Warehouse Trading Corp. ("Boston") sold ceramic mugs and other ceramic tableware products intended for the consumption of food or beverages with colored artwork...
