Proposition 65
August 18, 2003
A Consent Judgment in the DiPirro v. Joyce Chen, Inc., et al. matter, heard in the San Francisco County Superior Court, was entered on August 18, 2003. The Consent Judgment resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Joyce Chen, Inc. sold brass strainers and skimmers containing lead (or lead compounds) in the State of California without...
August 20, 2003
The Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in DiPirro v. Levitz Furniture Incorporated, et al. on August 20, 2003. The settlement resolved the allegations of citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro that defendant Levitz Furniture Corporation sold Tiffany-style lamps containing lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As...
June 7, 2005
The Marin Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case Brimer v. Four Star, et al., on June 7, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Four Star Group USA, Inc. and Four Star Group, Inc. (collectively "Four Star") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold certain candleholders that contain lead and/or lead...
Four Star Group USA, Inc., Four Star Group,Inc., Holiday & Seasonal Home Decor, Home Decorative Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
August 31, 2004
The San Francisco Superior Court of California entered a Consent Judgment on August 31, 2004 in Leeman v. Arc International, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Sur La Table, Inc. sold glassware and other tableware with colored artwork or designs (containing cadmium) on the exterior, in addition to mugs and other...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Leeman, Proposition 65, Sur La Table, Inc.
September 15, 2005
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Leeman v. Precidio, Inc., et al., on September 15, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that Precidio, Inc. ("Precidio") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold glass sets, drinking glasses, and other tableware products with colored artwork, designs, or...
March 2, 2006
WorldPantry.com, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 2, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, WorldPantry.com, Inc.
April 19, 2006
The Santa Clara Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on April 19, 2006, in Brimer v. Dave & Busters, Inc.; et al. In this matter, whistleblower Russell Brimer alleged that Dave & Busters, Inc. ("Dave and Busters") sold shot glasses and other glassware and ceramicware intended to hold food and/or beverages with colored artwork that contain the heavy metal...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Dave & Busters, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
September 20, 2011
On September 20, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. True Value Company and Chardon Corp., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants True Value Company and Chardon Corp. ("True Value and Chardon") sold Proman Tool Flashlights containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...
Chardon Corp., Hand Tools, Hardware, Household Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, True Value Company, Woodworking Power, Machine & Hand Tools
July 2, 2007
The Honorable Patrick J. Mahoney from the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on July 2, 2007 in Brimer v. Petro Stopping Centers, LP, et al. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant Petro Stopping Centers, LP ("Petro") sold shot glasses and other glassware with colored artwork containing the heavy metal...
June 12, 2000
On June 12, 2000, Plano Molding Company (“Plano”) elected to opt-into into a Consent Judgment to resolve citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro’s allegations that Plano and seventy-eight other defendants manufactured, distributed, or sold fishing tackle products containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite Proposition...
, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Fishing Tackle, Lead, Michael DiPirro, Plano Molding Company, Proposition 65, Proposition 65 Warning, Reformulation, Whistleblower
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.