firm casework - enforcement

April 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
JC Sales/Shims Bargains, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
April 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
PetSmart, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
April 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Allied Domecq North America Corp. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
March 30, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Golf Gifts & Gallery, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 30, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
March 30, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Karol Western Corp. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 30, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
March 30, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Trader Joe's Company elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 30, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
March 30, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Concord Enterprises Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 30, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
March 30, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
RC Ritzenhoff Cristal AG elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 30, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...