Nail Polish & Cosmetic Products

Nail Polish & Cosmetic Products

Due to routine and frequent use by consumers, our clients pay close attention when harmful chemicals are present in ordinary cosmetic and beauty products. The Chanler Group’s clients have successfully resolved many Proposition 65 enforcement actions brought against cosmetics and beauty salon industry members, as well as against chemical suppliers of those companies.

Our clients’ investigations have revealed high levels of a number of toxic chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm, including toluene, lead, and phthalate chemicals used as plasticizers in the vinyl/PVC manufacturing process. In negotiating settlements on behalf of our clients, The Chanler Group’s attorneys have obtained commitments from industry members to remove these listed chemicals from a variety of products, including nail polish and enamel, eye shadow, eyeliner, lipstick, and cosmetic and toiletry cases.

Toluene is the second-highest volume ingredient in many nail polishes, as it allows polish to remain fluid and to spread evenly at varying temperatures. Toluene, however, is listed by the State of California as a chemical that is known to cause reproductive harm or birth defects. Individuals using toluene-containing polishes or enamels are exposed to the chemical by inhalation while applying the product.

During 1993 and 1994, investigations conducted on behalf of The Chanler Group’s clients revealed significant levels of toluene in nail polish sold without a warning in California. A nonprofit public-interest group represented by the founder of our firm filed 45 private Proposition 65 enforcement actions naming major cosmetics manufacturers and retailers as defendants. The industry resisted and filed a SLAPP action (strategic lawsuit against public participation) in federal court in an effort to silence the private enforcer’s claims and allegations. Through tenacious litigation our attorneys obtained a dismissal of the industry’s suit and prevailed in state court, successfully enjoining the industry members from further unwarned sales in California. Ultimately, The Chanler Group obtained a commitment from 43 of the defendant manufacturers, including some of the biggest names in the industry, to completely remove toluene from their nail enamel and polish products.  The success extended beyond California, as the mostly-national companies undertook to reformulate all of their products sold nationwide. Today, the industry uses “toluene-free” to market many of its nail products.

Other successful enforcement actions brought by our clients and resolved in the public interest include cases of lead in eyeliner, eyeshadow, and other makeup products and vinyl makeup kits and toiletry cases containing lead and DEHP.  Today, our clients continue their efforts to protect the health and safety of California consumers by investigating cosmetic products for lead, toluene, and phthalates. 

To review legal agreements which our clients have reached with companies that sell nail polish and other cosmetic products, please see the cases below.

firm casework - enforcement

October 2, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower As You Sow entered into a settlement agreement with nail polish and enamel manufacturer and distributor American International Industries Group ("AIIG") on October 2, 1993. The settlement, which the parties submitted to the San Francisco Superior Court for approval and entry as a judgment, resolved AYS's...
August 31, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
On August 31, 1993, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower As You Sow and cosmetics manufacturers Max Factor & Company and Noxell Corporation entered an agreement resolving contentious litigation between the two parties. AYS commenced the private enforcement action on November 18, 1992, when it began issuing 60-Day Notices of Violation of Proposition 65 to...
August 24, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
On August 24, 1993, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, As You Sow, entered a settlement agreement with seven cosmetic, beauty and salon service industry members: Essie Cosmetics, Inc., Creative Nail Design, Vital Nails, Inc./Develop 10, Jessica Cosmetics International, Inc., Orly International, Inc., OPI Products, Inc., and American International...
August 20, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, As You Sow, and the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association ("CTFA") reached a settlement on August 20, 1993, that resolved AYS's allegations that thirteen national cosmetic manufacturers violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn consumers and other individuals in the state of California that the nail...
August 13, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
The Honorable Ollie Marie-Victoire, Judge of San Francisco Superior Court, entered a Judgment on August 13, 1993, according to the terms of the settlement reached between Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, As You Sow, and manufacturer of nail enamel and nail care products, Miss Marion Cosmetics, Inc. ("MMC"). The settlement resolved a private...
July 22, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
On July 22, 1993, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower As You Sow and cosmetics manufacturer Maybelline, Inc. entered an agreement resolving AYS's 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65 to Maybelline as well as pending litigation between the parties (As You Sow v. Revlon, Inc. et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case, No.CGC-93- 950766). The...
July 20, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
On July 20, 1993, the Honorable Ollie Marie-Victoire of the San Francisco Superior Court entered the Stipulated Judgment submitted for approval and entry by Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, As You Sow, and cosmetics manufacturer, Conopco, Inc. d/b/a/ Chesebrough-Ponds USA Co. and Elizabeth Arden, Co. (collectively, "Conopco"). The parties'...
June 30, 1993
Toluene
Consent Judgment
On June 30, 1993, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower As You Sow and cosmetics manufacturer Revlon, Inc. entered an agreement resolving litigation between the two parties. AYS commenced the private enforcement action on November 18, 1992, when it served Revlon with a 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65. After no public enforcer elected to prosecute...