Pet Supplies

Pet Supplies

The numbers say it all: according to the American Pet Products Association, 62% of U.S. households (72.9 million homes) include a pet.  It has been estimated that in 2012, $52.87 billion was spent on pets in the U.S. Unfortunately, many pet care products (from pet nail trimmers to pet tote/carrying bags) are made with vinyl components that may contain detectable levels of phthalates. Phthalates are "plasticizers" which are added to plastic components and materials in consumer products to increase their flexibility, transparency, durability, and longevity.  Phthalates are known to the State of California to cause birth defects and other reproductive harm. 

The Chanler Group's clients regularly investigate the presence of phthalate chemicals such as di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP"),  butyl benzyl phthalate ("BBP"), and Di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") that are often found in consumer products. 

Our clients have obtained settlements with numerous companies that sell pet supplies containing phthalates, securing reformulation agreements that virtually eliminate the presence of DEHP, BBP, and DBP in these products. To date, our clients continue their efforts to protect the health and safety of California consumers and their pets by investigating pet supplies for the presence of lead and phthalates.

To review legal agreements which The Chanler Group's clients have reached with companies in this industry, please see the cases below. 

firm casework - enforcement

April 8, 2005
Lead
Consent Judgment
Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's suit against Perky Pet Products was resolved on April 8, 2005, when a Consent Judgment was executed in Brimer v. Perky Pet Products; Lowe's HIW, Inc., Lowe's Companies, Inc. This enforcement action settled Brimer's allegations that Perky Pet sold glass and metal feeders containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...
July 12, 2002
Amitraz
Consent Judgment
A Consent Judgment in the case DiPirro v. Intervet Inc., et al. , heard in the San Francisco County Superior Court, was entered on July 17, 2002. The Consent Judgment resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Intervet Inc. sold agricultural products, such as Taktic Emulsifiable, containing amitraz in the State of California without...
May 6, 2002
Formaldehyde (gas)
Consent Judgment
Citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro reached a settlement in the case of DiPirro v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc., et al., with defendants Petco Animal Supplies, Inc., Aquatronics, Petsmart, Inc., and Aquarium Products on May 6, 2002. The settlement agreement resolved DiPirro's allegations that the defendants sold treatments for fish containing formaldehyde in the State of...
December 18, 2001
Lead
Consent Judgment
In a December 18, 2001 stipulated judgment, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, Michael DiPirro, and retail seller, The Bombay Company, Inc., agreed to terms resolving DiPirro's allegation that Bombay sold terrarium products containing lead without providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Lead is listed pursuant to Proposition 65...
December 4, 2001
Lead
Out-Of-Court Settlement
Citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro and settling defendants Virbac Corporation ("Virbac") and Petsmart, Inc. ("Petsmart") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement on December 4, 2001, which resolved DiPirro's allegations that Virbac manufactured and distributed and Petsmart sold tick collars containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...