Vinocur v. Central Garden & Pet Company

Date: 
July 18, 2019
On July 19, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Central Garden & Pet Company (“Central Garden”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Central Pet & Garden Company
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Beaver Medical to Pay $5M to Settle False Claims; Whistleblower to Get $850K

August 9, 2019
Image: 

Beaver Medical Group L.P. (Beaver) and one of its physicians, Dr. Sherif Khalil, have agreed to pay a total of $5,039,180 to resolve allegations that they reported invalid diagnoses to Medicare Advantage plans and thereby caused those plans to receive inflated payments from Medicare, the Justice Department announced. Beaver is headquartered in Redlands, California.    

Under the Medicare Advantage program, also known as the Medicare Part C program, Medicare beneficiaries may opt to obtain health care coverage through private insurance plans that are owned and operated by private insurers known as Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs). Medicare pays MAOs a fixed, monthly amount to provide health care coverage to Medicare beneficiaries who enroll in their plans. Medicare adjusts these monthly payments to reflect the health status of each beneficiary. In general, Medicare pays MAOs more for sicker beneficiaries and less for healthier ones.

MAOs often contract with physician groups and other healthcare providers to provide care to Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in their plans. These healthcare providers report diagnoses and other information to the MAOs, which the MAOs then submit to Medicare in order to obtain higher risk-adjusted payments. 

In this case, several MAOs in California contracted with Beaver to provide health care to Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in their plans. The MAOs often compensated Beaver with a share of the payments that the MAOs received from Medicare for the beneficiaries under Beaver’s care. Thus, Beaver had a financial incentive to submit additional diagnosis codes to the MAOs in order to increase the payments that the MAOs received from Medicare. The settlement resolves allegations that Beaver and Dr. Khalil knowingly submitted diagnoses that were not supported by the beneficiaries’ medical records in order to inflate the payments that the MAO received from Medicare.

The settlement resolves allegations originally brought in a lawsuit filed under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act by Dr. David Nutter, a former employee of Beaver. The act permits private parties to sue on behalf of the government for false claims for government funds and to receive a share of any recovery. Dr. Nutter will receive approximately $850,000.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

ITT Cannon to Pay $11M to Settle False Claims; Whistleblower to Get $2M

July 16, 2019
Image: 

ITT Cannon has agreed to pay the United States $11 million to settle False Claims Act allegations that it supplied electrical connectors to the military that had not been properly tested, the Justice Department announced today.  ITT sold the untested connectors both directly to the Government and through distributors and other government contractors which incorporated them into technology and equipment sold to the Government. 

The settlement resolves allegations that ITT did not conduct the required periodic testing on six models of electrical connectors.  The Government learned that ITT had not done this testing and ITT promised the Government that it would conduct remedial testing and report the result to the Government.  Shortly thereafter, ITT experienced several failures in its remedial testing.  ITT did not immediately disclose these failures but represented to the Government that it was merely behind in the remedial testing. 

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) issued an order stopping the shipment of the six connectors.  ITT issued six Government Industry Data Exchange Program notices (GIDEP) disclosing to industry its failure to conduct required testing, its test failures, and changes in the processes, materials, construction, sourcing and design of the connectors.  DLA then removed the six ITT connectors from the Qualified Products List (QPL).  The QPL lists products that have met the qualification requirements set forth in the applicable Military Specifications (Mil Specs), which are uniform engineering and technical requirements for certain products used by the Department of Defense.  DLA’s removal of ITT from the QPL precluded ITT from selling parts to the military covered by the Mil Specs.  Recently, ITT has requalified one of the connectors for sale to the Government.

The settlement resolves allegations filed in a lawsuit by Ralph Tatgenhorst, the former regional quality manager at ITT’s Santa Ana facility, in federal court in Los Angeles, California, under the whistleblower (or “qui tam”) provisions of the False Claims Act.  These provisions permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the Government for false claims and to share in any recovery.  Mr. Tatgenhorst will receive $2,090,000 as his share of the settlement amount. 

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Vipac Inc.

Date: 
June 14, 2019
Industry Categories: 
On June 14, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Vipac Inc. (“Vipac”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Vipac Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur Issues New 60-Day Notices of P65 Violation

July 24, 2019
Image: 

Laurence Vinocur has more 60-Day Notices of Violation of Proposition 65 for companies offering products such as glass jars, vinyl security cables, and bags with vinyl shoulder straps in California that contain chemicals known to the State to cause cancer and/or reproductive harm without the requisite health hazard warning.  Vinocur alleges that the companies’ products contain the heavy metal lead and/or the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and di-n-butyl phthalate, which are known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects and/or other reproductive harm.  Noticed companies include Lolli and Pops, Canon U.S.A., and Cannon Safe.

See our most recent 60-Day Notices

Cross-Post On: 
None

Alpha Guardian; Cannon Safe, Inc.

Notice Date: 
July 23, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Alpha Guardian; Cannon Safe, Inc.
Sub-Industry Code: 
Security
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use

Canon U.S.A., Inc.

Notice Date: 
July 23, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Sub-Industry Code: 
Bags & Accessories
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use

Lolli and Pops, Inc. Meetha Ventures LLC

Notice Date: 
July 23, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Lolli and Pops, Inc. Meetha Ventures LLC
Sub-Industry Code: 
Home Decor
Glass & Ceramic & Crystal
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use

Moore v. Poppin, Inc.

Date: 
June 5, 2019

Citizen enforcer John Moore and settling party Poppin, Inc. (“Poppin”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement on June 5, 2019.  Moore had alleged that Poppin sold ottomans with foam padding containing the flame retardant chemical tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (“TDCPP”) and tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate (“TCEP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Poppin, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC

Date: 
May 29, 2019
On May 29, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC (“PRS”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Pratt Retail Specialties, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content