Brimer v. Picnic Time, Inc.

Date: 
February 23, 2011
Industry Categories: 

On February 23, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Picnic Time, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Picnic Time, Inc. ("Picnic Time"), sold tote bag products containing the heavy metal lead and phthalate chemicals including di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") and di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Picnic Time, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.; et al.

Date: 
January 9, 2012

On February 8, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment and Proposition 65 Settlement in Brimer v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Restoration Hardware, Inc. ("Restoration Hardware") sold tape measures containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Restoration Hardware Incorporated, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$110,000 - $119,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Orange Circle Studio Corporation

Date: 
November 13, 2012

On November 13, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Orange Circle Studio Corporation ("Orange Circle") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Orange Circle sold planners/calendars with covers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Orange Circle Studio Corporation
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Office Depot, Inc.

Date: 
June 1, 2012

On June 1, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Office Depot, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Office Depot, Inc. ("Office Depot"), sold colored vinyl-coated paper fasteners containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Office Depot, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$230,000-$239,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Olympia Tools International, Inc.

Date: 
January 18, 2011

On January 18, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Olympia Tools International, Inc. ("Olympia") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Olympia sold tape measures with hand straps containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Olympia Tools International, Inc.
Type: 
Out of Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. MSRF, Inc.

Date: 
October 25, 2012

On October 25, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant MSRF, Inc. ("MSRF"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that MSRF sold mugs with colored artwork or designs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
MSRF, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$70,000-$79,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. ModCloth, Inc.

Date: 
September 19, 2012
Industry Categories: 

On September 19, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant ModCloth, Inc. ("ModCloth"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that ModCloth sold glassware with colored artwork or designs containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
ModCloth, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Melnor, Inc.

Date: 
July 27, 2012

On July 27, 2012, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Melnor, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Melnor, Inc. ("Melnor"), sold watering guns/nozzles with hand grips containing the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP"), di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP"), and the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Melnor, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Milano Series International Products Ltd.

Date: 
February 14, 2012

On February 14, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Milano Series International Products Ltd. ("Milano"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Milano sold cosmetic cases/bags containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Milano Series International Products Ltd.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Product Recall
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Mace Group, Incorporated

Date: 
August 23, 2011
Industry Categories: 

On August 23, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Mace Group, Incorporated ("Mace") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Mace sold cases and coverings for laptops containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Mace Group, Incorporated
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content