Brimer v. Mad Catz, Incorporated

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
October 11, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On October 11, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Mad Catz, Inc. ("Mad Catz"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Mad Catz sold backpacks containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconMad Catz.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Mad Catz, Incorporated
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Children

Brimer v. LRI Holdings Company, and LLC / Lynn Roberts International

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
October 12, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On October 12, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant LRI Holdings Company/Lynn Roberts International ("LRI"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that LRI sold eyewear retention cords made with materials containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconLRI.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
LRI Holdings Company, LLC
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Logitech, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 21, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Computers and Electronics
Featured: 
No

On November 21, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Logitech, Inc. ("Logitech"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Logitech sold headsets with cords containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconLogitech_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Logitech, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$90,000-$99,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Logo Chair, Incorporated et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
July 22, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Exercise/Fitness and Sporting Equipment/Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On July 22, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Logo Chair Incorporated, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Logo Chair, Incorporated ("Logo Chair") sold folding chairs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconLogo Chair.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Logo Chairs, Incorporated, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$170,000 ? 179,000
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Lady Captiva, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
May 31, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On May 31, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Lady Captiva, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Lady Captiva, Inc. dba Beltsville ("Lady Captiva"), sold wallets, handbags, purses, clutches, totes, belts, and cuffs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconLady Captiva.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Lady Captiva, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, VendorNotification
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Kingsbridge International, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 20, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On November 20, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Kingsbridge International, Inc. ("Kingsbridge"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Kingsbridge sold tools with grips containing the heavy metal lead and the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconKingsbridge_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Kingsbridge International, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties, Cy Pres
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Kinokuniya Book Stores of America Company Limited

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 15, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Featured: 
No

On September 15, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Kinokuniya Book Stores of America Company Ltd., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Kinokuniya Book Stores of America Company Limited ("Kinokuniya") sold decorated glassware and ceramic mugs with paint containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconKinokuniya.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Kinokuniya Book Stores of America Company Limited
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$60,000-$69,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Kmart Corporation; Notions Marketing Corporation

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
October 28, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On October 28, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Kmart Corporation, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Notions Marketing Corporation ("Notions") sold vinyl coated tape measures containing the heavy metal lead to retail customer Kmart Corporation ("Kmart") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconNotions_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Kmart Corporation
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. JJI International, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 1, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Computers and Electronics
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Featured: 
No

On November 1, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant JJI International, Inc.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconJJI_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
JJI International, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Jay Import Company, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
May 22, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Glazed Ceramics
Featured: 
No

On May 22, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Jay Import Company, Inc. ("Jay Import"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Jay Import sold mugs with colored artwork or designs on the exterior containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconJay Import_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Jay Import Company, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content