Brimer v. Genesco Incorporated

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 4, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On August 4, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Genesco, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Genesco Inc. ("Genesco"), sold handbags containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGenesco_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Genesco Incorporated
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Gibson Overseas, Incorporated

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 25, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Featured: 
No

On August 25, 2011, citizen enforcers Russell Brimer and Whitney Leeman and settling defendant Gibson Overseas, Incorporated ("Gibson") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Gibson sold decorated glassware products in the State of California containing the heavy metal lead without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGibson_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer, Leeman
Defendant: 
Gibson Overseas, Incorporated
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$110,000 - $119,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 29, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On June 29, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc. ("G&S") sold vinyl-coated wire containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconG&S Metal.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
G&S Corporation, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, warnings
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Franklin Sports, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 1, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On November 1, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Franklin Sports, Inc. ("Franklin"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Franklin sold baseball uniform belts composed of material containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the health hazard warnings required by Proposition 65.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFranklinSports_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Franklin Sports, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Franshaw, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
December 22, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On December 22, 2011, the Santa Clara County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Franshaw, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Franshaw, Inc. ("Franshaw") sold belts containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFranshaw.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Franshaw, Incorporated
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. FPC Corporation

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 11, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On April 11, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. FPC Corporation, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegation that the defendant FPC Corporation ("FPC") sold tape measures with hand straps containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconCJ_FPC_BrimerSig.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
FPC
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Forever 21, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 26, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On November 26, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Forever 21, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Forever 21, Inc. ("Forever 21") sold belts containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconForever 21_ROJ_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Forever 21, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$60,000-$69,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 9, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On January 9, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants, Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC ("Fortune and Master"), sold storage bags containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFortune_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000 -$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Four Seasons Design, Incorporated

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 8, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Computers and Electronics
Featured: 
No

On April 8, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Four Seasons Design, Incorporated ("Four Seasons") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Four Seasons sold in-ear stereo headphones, commonly referred to as earbuds, containing the heavy metal lead on the surface of accessible components, including the wires, in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFour Seasons_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Four Seasons Design, Incorporated
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Fellowes, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 27, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Computers and Electronics
Featured: 
No

On August 27, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Fellowes, Inc. ("Fellowes") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Fellowes sold travel and carry cases of electronic devices containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFellowes_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Fellowes, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content