Brimer v. Floracraft Corporation, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
December 12, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Craft and Hobby Supplies, Tools, and Lead Balancing Weights
Featured: 
No

On December 12, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Floracraft Corporation, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Floracraft Corporation ("Floracraft") sold color-coated wire products in the State of California containing the heavy metal lead without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFloracraft.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Floracraft Corporation, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$60,000 - $69,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Dixon Ticonderoga Company

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 20, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On August 20, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Dixon Ticonderoga Company ("Dixon") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Dixon sold pen pouches containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_Attach_Dixon.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Dixon Ticonderoga Company
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Dollar Empire, LLC

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 22, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On June 22, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Dollar Empire, LLC, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Dollar Empire, LLC ("Dollar Empire") sold vinyl-coated paper fasteners in the State of California containing the heavy metal lead without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_Attach_Dollar_Empire.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Dollar Empire, LLC
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000-$19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Delsey Luggage, Incorporated USA

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 18, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On November 18, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Delsey Luggage, Incorporated USA ("Delsey"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Delsey sold shopper bags containing the heavy metal lead and the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") and di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconDelsey.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Delsey Luggage, Incorporated USA
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Design for All, LLC

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 3, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On August 3, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Design for All, LLC ("Design for All"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Design for All sold belts containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconDesign For All.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Design for All, LLC
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Consolidated Shoe Company Incorporated

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 20, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On January 20, 2012, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Consolidated Shoe Company Incorporated, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Consolidated Shoe Company Incorporated ("Consolidated"), sold certain footwear containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconCSC_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Consolidated Shoe Company Incorporated
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$50,000 - $59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. CVS Pharmacy Incorporated, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 8, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On August 9, 2011, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. CVS Pharmacy Incorporated, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant CVS Pharmacy Incorporated ("CVS") distributed and/or sold flashlights containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconCVS_flashlights.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
CVS Pharmacy Incorporated, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Cyber Acoustics, L.L.C.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
October 4, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Computers and Electronics
Featured: 
No

On October 4, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Cyber Acoustics, L.L.C. ("Cyber") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Cyber sold audio headsets with vinyl/PVC cords containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconCyber_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Cyber Acoustics, L.L.C.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Coastal Cocktails, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
March 22, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Glazed Ceramics
Featured: 
No

On or about March 22, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Coastal Cocktails, Inc. ("Coastal Cocktails"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Coastal Cocktails sold mugs with colored artwork or designs on the exterior containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconCoastal_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Coastal Cocktails, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. ColArt Americas, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 20, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Craft and Hobby Supplies, Tools, and Lead Balancing Weights
Featured: 
No

On September 20, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. ColArt Americas, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant ColArt Americas, Inc. ("ColArt"), sold cases for art supplies containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconColArt.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
ColArt Americas Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, VendorNotification, Warnings
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content