CA OEHHA Reviewing Acetaminophen and Cannabis for P65 Listing

March 22, 2019
Image: 

The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has selected acetaminophen for review by the Carcinogen Identification Committee for possible listing under Proposition 65. OEHHA is initiating the development of hazard identification materials on this chemical and is requesting scientific information relevant to whether acetaminophen causes cancer. The data call-in period will end at 5:00 p.m. on April 29, 2019.

OEHHA has also selected cannabis (marijuana), marijuana (cannabis) smoke, cannabis extracts, and Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for review by the Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant Identification Committee for possible listing under Proposition 65. OEHHA is initiating the development of hazard identification materials on these chemicals and is requesting scientific information relevant to whether they cause reproductive toxicity (developmental toxicity endpoint). The data call-in period will end at 5:00 p.m. on April 29, 2019.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Vinocur v. M. Eagles Tool Warehouse, Inc.

Date: 
March 14, 2019
The parties involved in the case Vinocur v. M. Eagles Tool Warehouse, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on March 14, 2019.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur alleged that M. Eagles Tool Warehouse, Inc. (“M. Eagles”) sold circuit testers with vinyl/PVC components containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.  
 
As part of the agreement, M.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
M. Eagles Tool Warehouse, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Harris Mutual, LLC

Notice Date: 
March 11, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Harris Mutual, LLC
Sub-Industry Code: 
Security
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use

Covidien to Pay $17M for False Claims; Whistleblowers to Get $3M

March 22, 2019
Image: 

Covidien LP has agreed to pay $17,477,947 to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by providing free or discounted practice development and market development support to physicians located in California and Florida to induce purchases of Covidien’s vein ablation products, the Department of Justice announced earlier this month.  

The United States alleged that Covidien violated the Anti-Kickback Statute and, correspondingly, the False Claims Act by providing practice development and market development support to health care providers located in California and Florida, to induce those providers to purchase ClosureFAST(TM) radiofrequency ablation catheters that were billed to Medicare and to the California and Florida Medicaid programs.  ClosureFast(TM) catheters are used in procedures that treat venous reflux disease, a disease often marked by the presence of varicose veins.  The practice and market development support Covidien provided included customized marketing plans for specific vein practices; scheduling and conducting “lunch and learn” meetings and dinners with other physicians to drive referrals to specific vein practices; and providing substantial assistance to specific vein practices in connection with planning, promoting, and conducting vein screening events to cultivate new patients for those practices.

The Anti-Kickback Act prohibits the payment of remuneration to induce the referral or use of items or services paid for by federal health care programs.  Remuneration includes not only cash payments but also offers or payments made “in kind.” 

Under the settlement agreement, Covidien will pay an additional $1,474,892 to California and $1,047,160 to Florida for claims settled by these state Medicaid programs.  The Medicaid program is a jointly funded federal and state program. 

The settlement resolves allegations contained in lawsuits filed by Erin Hayes and Richard Ponder (former sales managers for Covidien) and Shawnea Howerton (a former employee of one of Covidien’s customers), which are pending in federal court in San Francisco, California.  The lawsuits were filed under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the United States for false claims and to share in any recovery.  Mr. Hayes and Mr. Ponder will receive $3,146,030 as their share of the federal recovery. 

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Boston International Import/Export, Inc.

Date: 
March 4, 2019
Industry Categories: 
On March 4, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Boston International Import/Export, Inc. (“Boston International”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Boston International Import/Export, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$1,000 - $9,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Kikkerland Design, Inc.

Date: 
February 28, 2019
On February 28, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Kikkerland Design, Inc. (“Kikkerland”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Kikkerland Design, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Lifetime Brands, Inc.

Date: 
February 28, 2019
On February 28, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Lifetime Brands, Inc. (“Lifetime”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Buck's Bags, Inc.

Date: 
February 22, 2019
On February 22, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Buck's Bags, Inc. (“Buck's Bags”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Buck's Bags, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Skyline Urology to Pay $1.85M to Settle False Claims; Whistleblower to Get $324K

March 9, 2019
Image: 

Skyline Urology has agreed to pay the United States $1.85 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by submitting improper claims to the Medicare program for evaluation and management services, the Department of Justice announced last month.

Skyline Urology allegedly submitted false claims to the Medicare program for evaluation and management (E&M) services that were not allowable under Medicare.  Medicare generally prohibits healthcare providers from separately billing for E&M services provided on the same day as another medical procedure, unless the E&M services are significant, separately identifiable, and above and beyond the usual preoperative and postoperative care associated with the medical procedure.  If an E&M service satisfies these criteria, the provider can use a billing code known as “Modifier 25” to bill for the significant and separately identifiable E&M services.  In this case, the government alleged that Skyline Urology used Modifier 25 to improperly unbundle routine E&M services that were not separately billable from other procedures performed on the same day, and, as a result, improperly claimed compensation from Medicare for certain urological services.

Skyline Urology has also entered into an Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General that will require regular monitoring of its billing practices for three years. 

The settlement resolves allegations in a lawsuit filed in the District of Maryland by James M. Cesare, the founder of the consulting firm Bay Area Healthcare Advisors LLC.  The lawsuit was filed under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the government for false claims and to share in any recovery.  As part of the resolution, Mr. Cesare will receive approximately $323,750.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Peter Pauper Press, Inc.

Date: 
February 21, 2019
On February 21, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Peter Pauper Press, Inc. (“Peter Pauper”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Peter Pauper Press, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content