D.F. Daniels Corporation

Notice Date: 
May 30, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Wozniak
Defendant: 
D.F. Daniels Corporation
Sub-Industry Code: 
Home Improvement
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use
Attached PDFs: 

Chunsan International, Inc.; Cheung's Rattan & Imports

Notice Date: 
May 30, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Wozniak
Defendant: 
Chunsan International, Inc.; Cheung's Rattan & Imports
Sub-Industry Code: 
Home Organization
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use
Attached PDFs: 

Catalina Products Corp.; Grocery Outlet Inc.

Notice Date: 
May 30, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Wozniak
Defendant: 
Catalina Products Corp.; Grocery Outlet Inc.
Sub-Industry Code: 
Patio & Garden
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use

B&G Equipment Company, Inc.

Notice Date: 
May 30, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Birth Defects, (Other) Reproductive Harm
Plaintiff: 
Wozniak
Defendant: 
B&G Equipment Company, Inc.
Sub-Industry Code: 
Patio & Garden
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use
Attached PDFs: 

Acme United Corporation

Notice Date: 
May 30, 2019
Alleged Harm: 
Cancer
Plaintiff: 
Wozniak
Defendant: 
Acme United Corporation
Sub-Industry Code: 
Crafts & Parts
Designated For Use By: 
Adult/Child Use
Attached PDFs: 

U.S. Intervenes in False Claims Case Against Home Health Agency

May 24, 2019
Image: 

The United States has filed a complaint in intervention against Doctor’s Choice Home Care Inc (Doctor’s Choice), Timothy Beach, and Stuart Christensen alleging False Claims Act violations arising from the alleged payment of kickbacks in the form of sham medical director agreements and payments to the spouses of referring physicians, the Department of Justice announced today. Doctor’s Choice is a home health agency based in Sarasota, Florida. Timothy Beach and Stuart Christensen are partial owners of Doctor’s Choice.

The lawsuit alleges that Doctor’s Choice, with the knowledge of Beach and Christensen, paid kickbacks in the form of sham medical directorships to three physicians to refer patients to Doctor’s Choice. All three physicians allegedly did little, if any, of the work for which Doctor’s Choice paid them as medical directors. Sham medical director agreements to induce patient referrals violate the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law. Doctor’s Choice also allegedly paid some employees in a manner that accounted for the volume of referrals by their physician spouses, in violation of the Stark Law.    

The Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits anyone from offering or paying remuneration in order to induce or reward referrals for services paid for under federal healthcare programs. The Stark Law forbids certain medical providers, including home health agencies, from submitting claims to Medicare for services provided to patients who were referred by a physician with whom the provider has a prohibited financial relationship, unless that relationship falls within an applicable exception. 

The lawsuit was filed under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which allow private parties to file suit on behalf of the United States for false claims and receive a share of any recovery. The act permits the United States to intervene and take over responsibility for litigating the case, as it has done here. A defendant who violates the act is subject to three times the government’s losses, plus applicable penalties. 

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Merrick Engineering, Inc.

Date: 
April 30, 2019
On April 30, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Merrick Engineering, Inc. (“Merrick”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Merrick Engineering, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. W. Atlee Burpee Company

Date: 
April 29, 2019
On April 29, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party W. Atlee Burpee Company (“Burpee”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
W. Atlee Burpee Company
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Nuvue Products

Date: 
April 29, 2019
On April 29, 2019, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling party Nuvue Products (“Nuvue”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Nuvue Products
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Vinocur v. Paper House Productions, Inc.

Date: 
April 19, 2019
On April 19, 2019, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Paoer House Productions, Inc. (“Paper House”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.
Plaintiff: 
Vinocur
Defendant: 
Paper House Productions, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
Civil Penalties
Monetary Relief: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content