Since its inception, The Chanler Group and its clients have tirelessly researched and analyzed consumer products for the presence of detectable levels of heavy metals, phthalates, and other toxins. Over the last two decades, The Chanler Group’s clients, acting as citizen enforcers on behalf of California consumers, have filed hundreds of Proposition 65 notices, and pursued lengthy litigation in an effort to secure reformulation commitments for these products from their sellers and manufacturers. The Chanler Group’s clients continue to closely monitor these industries to ensure the health and safety of all California residents.
THT Designs, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Trade Associates Group elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Progressive Balloons Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
New Creative Enterprises, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 16, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
SakeOne Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 16, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Aloha Shoyu Company, Ltd. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
Big Dog Holdings, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Brimer v. Cables to Go, et al. on December 15, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Cables to Go, Lastar, Inc., TigerDirect, Inc., and Systemax Inc. ("Defendants") manufactured, sold, and/or distributed certain solder (containing lead)...
The Kitchen Collection, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
Shemran, Inc. (d/b/a Barons Marketplace) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Leeman v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., et al., on December 15, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendants Big Lots Stores, Inc. and PNS Stores, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") distributed and/or sold certain glass and metal terrariums or...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. House of Blues, et al., on December 14, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant HOB Entertainment ("HOB") manufactured, sold, and/or distributed certain shot glasses, mugs, and other glassware and ceramicware with colored artwork or designs on...
J.J. Paramount International Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 14, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case Brimer v. Home Depot USA, Inc., et al., on December 13, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Home Depot USA, Inc., Expo Design Center, Inc., and Evergreen Enterprises Inc. (collectively "Defendants") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold...
The Honorable James L. Warren of the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on December 13, 2005, in Brimer v. Smith Novelty Company, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants, Smith News Company, Inc. dba Smith Novelty Company (collectively "Smith"), sold mugs, shot glasses, and...
