Chanler Case Archive

Since its inception, The Chanler Group and its clients have tirelessly researched and analyzed consumer products for the presence of detectable levels of heavy metals, phthalates, and other toxins. Over the last two decades, The Chanler Group’s clients, acting as citizen enforcers on behalf of California consumers, have filed hundreds of Proposition 65 notices, and pursued lengthy litigation in an effort to secure reformulation commitments for these  products from their sellers and manufacturers. The Chanler Group’s clients continue to closely monitor these industries to ensure the health and safety of all California residents.

firm casework - enforcement

Format: 2026-04-22
Format: 2026-04-22
December 5, 2005
Toluene
Consent Judgment
The San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Onward Manufacturing Company Limited, et al., on December 5, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that Onward Manufacturing Company Limited ("Onward") sold BBQ touch-up paint containing toluene in the State of California without providing the...
November 29, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Brimer v. Kohl's Corporation, et al. on November 29, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Kohl's Corporation ("Kohl's") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold certain glass containers intended to hold beverages with colored...
November 25, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Norpro elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
November 22, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Charles Products, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 22, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 22, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgement
Florists Transworld Delivery Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 22, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate...
November 22, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
The Neuwirth Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 22, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
November 22, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
notNeutral, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 22, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Allied IMEX, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Ande Rooney, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Crystal Clear Industries elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Deere & Company elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Highland Graphics, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Leanin’ Tree Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Royal Products, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Smith-Western Co. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...