Ceramic Food & Beverage Products
Synonyms
- Ceramic Food and Beverage Products
July 5, 2013
(Other) Reproductive Harm, Birth Defects, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Mugs with Exterior Designs, Sylvia Rupar, Inc.
August 31, 2004
The San Francisco Superior Court of California entered a Consent Judgment on August 31, 2004 in Leeman v. Arc International, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Sur La Table, Inc. sold glassware and other tableware with colored artwork or designs (containing cadmium) on the exterior, in addition to mugs and other...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Leeman, Proposition 65, Sur La Table, Inc.
April 19, 2006
The Santa Clara Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on April 19, 2006, in Brimer v. Dave & Busters, Inc.; et al. In this matter, whistleblower Russell Brimer alleged that Dave & Busters, Inc. ("Dave and Busters") sold shot glasses and other glassware and ceramicware intended to hold food and/or beverages with colored artwork that contain the heavy metal...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Dave & Busters, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
November 22, 2005
Florists Transworld Delivery Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 22, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Florists Transworld Delivery Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 21, 2006
Summerwood Winery & Inn, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 21, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Summerwood Winery & Inn, Inc.
June 19, 2006
Richard Pola & Associates, Inc. dba R.P. & Associates, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Richard Pola & Associates, Inc. dba R.P. & Associates, Inc., Russell Brimer
December 18, 2012
On December 18, 2012, the parties involved in the case Brimer v. Smart Innovations, Inc.; et al. executed a Consent Judgment, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer’s allegations that the defendant Smart Innovations, Inc. dba Smart Planet (“Smart Innovations”) sold coffee cups with exterior designs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...
Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Citizen Enforcer, Coffee Cups with Exterior Designs, Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Smart Innovations, Inc., Smart Planet, Whistleblower
November 18, 2005
Shonfeld’s USA Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Shonfeld's USA Inc.
March 31, 2006
Legoland California, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 31, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Legoland California, LLC, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
December 19, 2005
Forum Novelties, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Forum Novelties, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.