Ceramic Food & Beverage Products
Synonyms
- Ceramic Food and Beverage Products
October 19, 2005
Dorothy C. Thorpe, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on October 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Dorothy C. Thorpe, LLC, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 6, 2006
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc. and Greenbrier International, Inc. (collectively “Dollar Tree”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006. In doing so,...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Greenbrier International, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
November 16, 2007
On November 16, 2007, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Dole Plantation, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Castle & Cooke Properties, Inc. dba Dole Plantation, Castle & Cooke, Inc., and Dole Food Company, Inc. ("Dole") sold shot glasses and other glassware and...
Castle & Cooke Properties, Inc. dba Dole Plantation, Castle & Cooke, Inc., Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Dole Food Company, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 12, 2006
Direct Retailing, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Direct Retailing, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
January 31, 2006
Dicksons, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 31, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Dicksons, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
May 5, 2006
Diamond Hong, Inc. and WFL, Inc. (collectively “Diamond Hong”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, Diamond Hong became a member of a class of settling...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Diamond Hong, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, WFL, Inc.
March 13, 2006
Delton Products Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 13, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Delton Products Corporation, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
August 5, 2008
On August 5, 2008, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Delivery Agent, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Delivery Agent, Inc. ("Delivery") sold ceramic mugs and other ceramic containers with colored artwork containing the heavy metal lead and cadmium on the exterior in...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Delivery Agent, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
November 21, 2005
Deere & Company elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Deere & Company, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
November 14, 2005
Dark Horse Comics, Inc. and Things From Another World, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 14, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Dark Horse Comics, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Things From Another World, Inc.
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.