Home Box Office, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. House of Blues, et al., on December 14, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant HOB Entertainment ("HOB") manufactured, sold, and/or distributed certain shot glasses, mugs, and other glassware and ceramicware with colored artwork or designs on the...
Highland Graphics, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Heineken USA, Incorporated elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
The Honorable Peter J. Busch entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Specialty Sports Ventures, LLC, et al. on October 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant, Specialty Sports Ventures, LLC dba Heavenly Sports ("SSV"), sold glassware and ceramicware with colored artwork containing the heavy metal lead and/or cadmium in...
Hanover Direct, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 14, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Hampshire House Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 30, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Halby Marketing, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 2, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Golf Gifts & Gallery, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 30, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Goldstar Supermarket elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
