On February 8, 2007, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. ("Fingerhut"), sold ceramicware and glass and metal products containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...
Ethel M. Chocolates, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case Brimer v. Enesco Group, Inc., et al., on November 14, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Enesco Group, Inc. ("Enesco") manufactured, sold, and/or distributed certain goblets, glass bowls, and other glassware products intended for the storage or...
The Encore Group, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 7, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Elegant Dining Products and Volume Distributors, Inc. (collectively “Elegant Dining”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on July 10, 2006. In doing so, Elegant Dining became a member...
Edna Valley Vineyard elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
The enforcement action Brimer v. Eden Marketing Corporation, et al., was resolved on June 5, 2007, when the Honorable Joseph Huber entered a Consent Judgment. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant, Eden Marketing Corporation ("Eden"), sold bowls and other glassware containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without...
Whistleblower Russell Brimer's allegations against the defendants Carlton Cards Retail, Inc., ("CCR") and American Greetings Corporation ("AGC") were resolved on February 2, 2006, when the Honorable Henry E. Needham, Jr. entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Drug Emporium, Inc.; et al. In this enforcement action, Brimer alleged that CCR and AGC sold...
Downeast Concepts, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Dorothy C. Thorpe, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on October 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
