Jelly Belly Candy Company

Brimer v. Jelly Belly Candy Company, et al.
November 10, 2005
Jelly Belly Candy Company elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 10, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Decorative Glass/Ceramic, Home Decor, Kitchen & Dining, Tableware
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Jelly Belly Candy Company, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
Cadmium, Lead
Read More