Behn of North America elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Shonfeld’s USA Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Legoland California, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 31, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Forum Novelties, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Leanin’ Tree Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
On February 8, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment and Proposition 65 Settlement in Brimer v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Restoration Hardware, Inc. ("Restoration Hardware") sold tape measures containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...
On September 29, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Rooster Products International, Inc. ("Rooster"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Rooster sold bags containing the heavy metal lead.
As part of the settlement, Rooster agreed not to sell any bags in California after December 31...
The San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Carrini, Inc., on November 27, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Carrini, Inc. ("Carrini") sold footwear containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard...
On September 7, 2011, citizen enforcers Russell Brimer and John Moore entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement with settling defendant Kikkerland Design, Inc. ("Kikkerland"), which resolved Brimer's allegations that Kikkerland sold glassware with exterior decorations containing excessive amounts of the heavy metal lead in the State of California without...
