Exercise/Fitness and Sporting Equipment/Accessories

Exercise/Fitness and Sporting Equipment/Accessories

From baseballs to exercise mats and sauna fitness suits to fishing gear, The Chanler Group's clients have investigated and tested a wide spectrum of sporting equipment and accessories.  Their ongoing investigations have found exercise, fitness, and sporting equipment containing detectable levels of lead and phthalates being sold throughout the State of California without the requisite Proposition 65 health hazard warnings.

Phthalates are "plasticizers,” chemicals added to plastic components and materials in consumer products to increase their flexibility, transparency, durability, and longevity and are listed by the State of California as chemicals known to cause reproductive harm.  The Chanler Group regularly investigates the presence of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP"), butyl benzyl phthalate ("BBP"), and Di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") found in consumer products.   

As a neurotoxin, lead is a highly-toxic heavy metal that aversely affects the nervous system. It is especially dangerous to children’s brains. Research has shown that repeated exposure to lead cumulatively affects the developing nervous system and, over time, can lead to attention deficit, learning disabilities, short-term memory loss, behavioral problems, and diminished intellectual ability.  Children under the age of six are most at risk for developmental problems stemming from lead poisoning as a result of their frequent hand-to-mouth activity and their small body size.

In most instances, enforcement actions brought by The Chanler Group not only procure compliance with Proposition 65's health hazard warning requirements, but also secure a commitment of product reformulation from companies. Such reformulation often results in the virtual elimination of lead and phthalates from the stipulated products. 

For instance, in DiPirro v. Western-Hoegee Company, et al., Michael DiPirro, a Chanler Group client, alleged that Western-Hoegee Company and more than 100 additional settling defendants sold fishing tackle that contained lead.  The Chanler Group negotiated $500,000 in civil penalties from the settling defendants, a portion of which was credited as incentive for the settling defendants to go beyond placing the required Proposition 65 health hazard warnings on the products in question by eliminating the sale of certain products in California. 

Today, The Chanler Group's clients continue their efforts to protect the health of California consumers by investigating exercise, fitness, and sporting equipment for the presence of lead and phthalates.  To review legal agreements which The Chanler Group's clients have reached with companies in this industry, please see the cases below.

firm casework - enforcement

April 9, 2018
DEHP, Lead
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Vinocur v. Streamlight, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on April 9, 2018.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur alleged that Streamlight, Inc. (“Streamlight”) sold portable lighting products containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) and the heavy metal lead in the State...
April 5, 2018
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On April 5, 2018, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling party Fairway Import-Export, Inc. (“Fairway”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement. Moore had alleged that Fairway sold gloves with vinyl/PVC components containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the...
March 19, 2018
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Englander v. Smith Ventures, Ltd., et al. executed a Consent Judgment on March 19, 2018.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Peter Englander alleged that Smith Ventures, Ltd. (“Smith Ventures”) sold vinyl/PVC exercise balls containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
February 23, 2018
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Vinocur v. Neet Products, Inc., et al. executed a Consent Judgment on February 23, 2018.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur alleged that Neet Products, Inc. (“Neet”) sold vinyl/PVC quivers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without...
January 18, 2018
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Held v. Morris Rothenberg & Son, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on January 18, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that Morris Rothenberg & Son, Inc. (“Morris”) sold camp showers with vinyl/PVC tubing containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP...
December 28, 2017
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Englander v. Arctic Cat Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on December 28, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Peter Englander alleged that Arctic Cat Inc. (“Arctic Cat”) sold gloves with vinyl/PVC components and stickers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
December 19, 2017
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Wozniak v. Wilson Hunt International Ltd. executed a Consent Judgment on December 19, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Paul Wozniak alleged that Wilson Hunt International Ltd. (“Wilson Hunt”) sold bags containing the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”), diisononyl phthalate (“...
December 18, 2017
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On December 18, 2017, citizen enforcer Peter Englander and settling party Barbaras Development, Inc. (“Barbaras”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement. Englander had alleged that Barbaras sold vinyl/PVC tablecloths containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the...