Exercise/Fitness and Sporting Equipment/Accessories

Exercise/Fitness and Sporting Equipment/Accessories

From baseballs to exercise mats and sauna fitness suits to fishing gear, The Chanler Group's clients have investigated and tested a wide spectrum of sporting equipment and accessories.  Their ongoing investigations have found exercise, fitness, and sporting equipment containing detectable levels of lead and phthalates being sold throughout the State of California without the requisite Proposition 65 health hazard warnings.

Phthalates are "plasticizers,” chemicals added to plastic components and materials in consumer products to increase their flexibility, transparency, durability, and longevity and are listed by the State of California as chemicals known to cause reproductive harm.  The Chanler Group regularly investigates the presence of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP"), butyl benzyl phthalate ("BBP"), and Di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") found in consumer products.   

As a neurotoxin, lead is a highly-toxic heavy metal that aversely affects the nervous system. It is especially dangerous to children’s brains. Research has shown that repeated exposure to lead cumulatively affects the developing nervous system and, over time, can lead to attention deficit, learning disabilities, short-term memory loss, behavioral problems, and diminished intellectual ability.  Children under the age of six are most at risk for developmental problems stemming from lead poisoning as a result of their frequent hand-to-mouth activity and their small body size.

In most instances, enforcement actions brought by The Chanler Group not only procure compliance with Proposition 65's health hazard warning requirements, but also secure a commitment of product reformulation from companies. Such reformulation often results in the virtual elimination of lead and phthalates from the stipulated products. 

For instance, in DiPirro v. Western-Hoegee Company, et al., Michael DiPirro, a Chanler Group client, alleged that Western-Hoegee Company and more than 100 additional settling defendants sold fishing tackle that contained lead.  The Chanler Group negotiated $500,000 in civil penalties from the settling defendants, a portion of which was credited as incentive for the settling defendants to go beyond placing the required Proposition 65 health hazard warnings on the products in question by eliminating the sale of certain products in California. 

Today, The Chanler Group's clients continue their efforts to protect the health of California consumers by investigating exercise, fitness, and sporting equipment for the presence of lead and phthalates.  To review legal agreements which The Chanler Group's clients have reached with companies in this industry, please see the cases below.

firm casework - enforcement

March 31, 2017
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On March 31, 2017, citizen enforcer Peter Englander and settling party LeeMarc Industries, Inc. (“LeeMarc”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.  Englander had alleged that LeeMarc sold gloves with vinyl/PVC components containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without...
March 16, 2017
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Englander v. Studio Ray, LLC executed a Consent Judgment on March 16, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Peter Englander alleged that Studio Ray, LLC (“Studio Ray”) sold gloves with vinyl/PVC components containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without...
March 15, 2017
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On March 15, 2017, citizen enforcer Peter Englander and settling party The Boelter Companies, Inc. (“Boelter”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.  Englander had alleged that Boelter sold vinyl/PVC coolies containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the...
March 9, 2017
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On March 9, 2017, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling party Yeti Coolers, LLC (“YETI”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.  Brimer had alleged that YETI sold vinyl/PVC security cables containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health...
March 2, 2017
DEHP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Moore v. Hunter’s Specialties, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on March 2, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that Hunter’s Specialties, Inc. (“HSI”) sold vinyl/PVC tool grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California...
February 22, 2017
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On February 22, 2016, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling party Pelican Products, Inc. (“Pelican”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.  Moore had alleged that Pelican sold seat cushions containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health...
February 15, 2017
DEHP
Out-of-Court Settlement
On February 15, 2017, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Motorsport Aftermarket Group, Inc. (“Motorsport Aftermarket”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement.  Vinocur had alleged that Motorsport Aftermarket sold gloves with vinyl/PVC components containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”)...
February 2, 2017
TDCPP
Consent Judgment
The parties involved in the case Vinocur v. W.C. Redmon Co., Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on February 2, 2017.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur alleged that W.C. Redmon Co., Inc. (“Redmon”) sold tent/shelter fabrics containing the flame retardant chemical tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (“TDCPP”) in the State of...