Brimer v. I Apparel Group LLC

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 22, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On September 22, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant I Apparel Group LLC ("I Apparel"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that I Apparel sold belts containing the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP"), di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") and the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_Attach_I_Apparel.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
I Apparel Group LLC
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. ICUP, Incorporated, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 4, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Featured: 
No

On January 4, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. ICUP, Incorporated; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, ICUP, Inc. ("ICUP"), sold glassware with colored artwork or designs on the exterior containing the heavy metals lead and cadmium in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconICUP.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
ICUP, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$130,000 - $139,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Inventory Liquidators Corp.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
March 29, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On March 29, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Inventory Liquidators Corp. ("ILC") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that ILC sold flashlights containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconInventory_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Inventory Liquidators Corp.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Howard Berger Company Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
May 11, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On May 11, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Howard Berger Company, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Howard Berger Company Inc. ("Howard") sold work lights with clamp handles containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_HowardBerger_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Howard Berger Company Inc, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$60,000 - $69,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Hypnotic Hats, Ltd.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
December 6, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Children's Apparel and Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On December 6, 2011, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Hypnotic Hats, Ltd., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. ("Hypnotic Hats"), sold Pink Cookie Fashion Belts containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconHypnotic.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Hypnotic Hats, Ltd., et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings, VendorNotification
Monetary: 
$40,000 - $49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Children

Brimer v. Hampton Products International Corporation, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 21, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On April 21, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Hampton Products International Corporation; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Hampton Products International Corporation ("Hampton") sold rachet tie-downs with handles containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior surface in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconHampton_ROJ_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Hampton Products International Corporation
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$60,000-$69,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. and Carrand Companies, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 29, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On April 29, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corp; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. ("Hopkins") and Carrand Companies, Inc. ("Carrand") sold padlocks containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconHopkins.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. and Carrand Companies, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Global Amici, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 7, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Featured: 
No

On August 7, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Global Amici, Inc. ("Global") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Global sold glass cruets with exterior designs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGlobal Amici_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Global Amici, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults

Brimer v. Giftcraft, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 15, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On September 15, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Giftcraft Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Giftcraft, Inc. ("Giftcraft") sold glass rain gauges containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGiftcraft.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Giftcraft, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. G.H. Meiser & Co.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
February 16, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Automotive Products
Featured: 
No

On February 16, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant G.H. Meiser & Co. ("G.H. Meiser") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that G.H. Meiser sold tire pressure gauges containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGHM_executed_Stlmnt Agrmnt.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
G.H. Meiser & Co.
Type: 
Out-of-Court-Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content