The Honorable James L. Warren of the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on December 13, 2005, in Brimer v. Smith Novelty Company, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants, Smith News Company, Inc. dba Smith Novelty Company (collectively "Smith"), sold mugs, shot glasses, and other...
Skyy Spirits LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
The Solano County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on September 27, 2007, when the Honorable Franklin R. Taft granted the parties' motion to approve the Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Six Flags Theme Park, Inc., et al. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that defendant Six Flags Theme Park, Inc. ("Six Flags") sold glassware and/or...
Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations against defendants Shun Fat Supermarket, Inc. and SF Supermarket, Inc. (collectively "Shun Fat") were resolved on May 29, 2007, when the Sacramento County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Shun Fat Supermarket, Inc., et al. In this matter, Brimer alleged that Shun Fat sold rice bowls and other...
Sherwood Brands, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on August 9, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Shemran, Inc. (d/b/a Barons Marketplace) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate...
See’s Candy Shops, Incorporated/See’s Candies, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Sears Roebuck and Co., et al., on June 3, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Sears Roebuck and Co. ("Sears") distributed and/or sold certain tumblers, stemware, and other glassware with colored artwork or designs containing lead on the...
The Honorable Frank Roesch entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Screen–It Graphics of Lawrence, Inc., et al. on August 1, 2007. In this enforcement action, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that defendants Screen–It Graphics of Lawrence, Inc. and Grandstand Sportsware and Glassware (collectively “Screen-It”) sold pilsner glasses and other...
Save Mart Supermarkets (dba Save Mart and Food Maxx) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 31, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually...
