The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Santa Barbara Ceramic Design, et al., on November 1, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Santa Barbara Ceramic Design ("Santa Barbara") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold certain oil bottles and other glassware products with colored artwork,...
The Superior Court of California for the City and County of San Francisco entered a Consent Judgment on May 3, 2005 in Brimer v. Sanrio, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Sanrio sold drinking glasses and other tableware with colored artwork or designs (containing lead) on the exterior in the State of California...
The San Francisco County Superior Court approved and entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Saks, Inc., et al., on April 26, 2005. The settlement resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Saks sold stemware and other glassware with colored artwork or designs (containing lead) on the exterior and stemware and other glassware with colored artwork...
SakeOne Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 16, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Safeway Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Russ Berrie and Company, Inc., et al., on October 12, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Russ Berrie and Company ("Russ Berrie") distributed and/or sold certain ceramic mugs and other ceramic tableware products with colored artwork, designs,...
Royal Products, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
In the enforcement action Brimer v. Royal Doulton USA, Inc., et al., the Honorable Nancy L. Davis approved a Consent Judgment on December 20, 2007. The Consent Judgment included an opt-in program which provided citzen enforcer Brimer with the ability to send 60-Day Notices of Violation to each entity that submitted an Opt-In Stipulation. In this matter, Brimer...
The San Francisco Superior Court of California entered a Consent Judgment on November 18, 2004 in Leeman v. Rite Aid Corporation, et al. The settlement resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Rite Aid sold mugs with colored artwork or designs (containing lead) on the exterior, and tableware with colored artwork or designs (containing...
In an agreement entered on February 28, 2005, Proposition 65 private enforcer and whistleblower, Michael DiPirro, and manufacturer of glass and ceramic tableware, Reno-Tahoe Specialty, Inc., agreed to terms resolving DiPirro's allegation made in a July 30, 2004, 60-day notice of violation of Proposition 65 DiPirro issued to RTS. The settlement also resolves litigation...
