The Honorable Peter J. Busch entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. World Kitchen, LLC, et al. on June 14, 2007. In this enforcement action, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant, World Kitchen, LLC ("World Kitchen"), sold cups, coolers, and other ceramicware and glassware with colored artwork on the exterior surface containing the heavy metal...
On May 5, 2008, the Los Angeles County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Wing Hop Fung Ginseng, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Wing Hop Fung Ginseng, Inc. ("Wing Hop") sold ceramic containers with colored artwork on the exterior surface containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...
Wine Things Unlimited Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 16, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
WinCo Foods, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Winchester Mystery House Gift Shop LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 28, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Walong Marketing, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
The San Francisco County Superior court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. ETS Express, Inc., et al on December 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that The Vernon Company ("Vernon") sold ceramicware with colored artwork containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior in the State of California without providing the requisite health...
VA Software Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
V. Sattui Winery elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 10, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
In the case Brimer v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc.; et al. the Honorable James L. Warren entered a Consent Judgment on January 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants Universal Screen Arts, Inc., Signals Catalogue Corp., Lillian Vernon Corporation, Casual Living USA, Inc., and RedEnvelope, Inc. (collectively "Defendants")...
