Fortune Brands, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Formation, Inc. and JLM Formation, Inc. (collectively “Formation”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 14, 2005. In doing so, Formation became a member of a class of settling...
Dennis Foland, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Flowers Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on October 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Florida State Distributors Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 27, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
On February 8, 2007, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. ("Fingerhut"), sold ceramicware and glass and metal products containing the heavy metal lead in the State of...
On June 30, 2008, the Fresno County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Fiesta Food Warehouse; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Fiesta Food Warehouse, LLC and Fiesta Mexicana Market, L.P. (collectively "Fiesta") sold ceramic mugs and other ceramic containers with colored artwork containing the...
Ethel M. Chocolates, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
The Encore Group, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 7, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Whistleblower Russell Brimer's allegations against the defendants Carlton Cards Retail, Inc., ("CCR") and American Greetings Corporation ("AGC") were resolved on February 2, 2006, when the Honorable Henry E. Needham, Jr. entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Drug Emporium, Inc.; et al. In this enforcement action, Brimer alleged that CCR and AGC sold...
