The San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Hyler Enterprises, Inc. on December 20, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant Hyler Enterprises, Inc ("Hyler") sold wine glasses and other glassware and mugs and other ceramicware with colored artwork on the exterior containing the heavy metal...
On September 22, 2005, Russell Brimer and Hunter Manufacturing Group, Inc. reached a settlement agreement that resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that Hunter manufactured, distributed or sold glasses, mugs, bowls, teapots and other glassware and ceramicware with colored designs and/or artwork on the exterior containing lead and cadmium in the State of...
Hudson Group elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
The Superior Court of California City and County of San Francisco entered a Consent Judgment on March 9, 2005 in the matter of Leeman v. Houston Harvest Gift Products LLC, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that the defendant Houston Harvest sold tableware with colored artwork or designs (containing lead) on the exterior, and...
Housewares International, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Hormel Foods Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Home Box Office, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Highland Graphics, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Heineken USA, Incorporated elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
The Honorable Peter J. Busch entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Specialty Sports Ventures, LLC, et al. on October 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant, Specialty Sports Ventures, LLC dba Heavenly Sports ("SSV"), sold glassware and ceramicware with colored artwork containing the heavy metal lead and/or cadmium in...
